Biomass and Municipal
Solid Waste
Introduction
Biomass is any material of recent biological origin. There
is a huge variety of biomass resources, conversion technologies,
and end products as shown below. Two technologies that
show significant potential for Kauai are "Direct Fired Biomass"
and mass burn of municipal solid waste.
|
Biomass Sources
Forests
Natural regrowth
Energy forests
Forest residue
Processing residues
Agriculture
Crop residues
Processing residues
Energy crops
Wastes
Municipal
Agricultural
Fuel Products
Solid Fuels
Charcoal
Wood chips
Pellets/briquettes
Gaseous Fuels
Methane
Pyrolysis gas
Producer gas
Liquid Fuels
Plant esters/oils
Ethanol
Methanol
Pyrolysis liquids
Biodiesel
|
Processing
Drying
Extrusion
Compression
Chipping
Carbonization
Anaerobic digestion
Fermentation
Gasification
Pyrolysis
Fischer tropsch
End Markets
Electricty
Heat
Solid fuels
Transport |
Direct biomass combustion power plants burn the biomass in
boilers to produce steam, which is expanded through a turbine to
produce electricity. Prior to combustion in the boiler,
the biomass fuel may require some processing (drying, chipping,
etc) to improve the physical and chemical characteristics.
Wood is the most common biomass fuel. Other biomass fuels
include agricultural residues such as bagasse, dried manure and
sewage sludge, black liquor, and dedicated fuel crops such as
fast growing grasses and eucalyptus. The capacity of
biomass plants is usually less than 50 MW because of the expense
of transporting a dispersed fuel to a central location.
Municipal solid waste (MSW) may also be burned to generate
electricity, The three most common types of MSW plants are
1) mass burn, 2) refuse derived fuels, and 3) plasma arc.
In a mass burn plant, the MSW is burned similar to the direct
biomass combustion described above. In a refuse derived
fuel facility, the trash is pre-processed to remove the
recyclable materials and convert it to fluff or pellets for ease
of handling. A plasma arc facility burns the trash using a
high temperature electric arc. For Kauai, the mass burning
of MSW is most promising primarily due to cost.
Potential for Kauai and KIUC
Kauai has very good potential for power production from biomass.
Until recently, the island generated a significant portion of
its power from bagasse, the fibrous residue from sugarcane.
However, the amounts of electricity that can be generated by
bagasse available from the one remaining sugar plantation is
limited to about 8.6 MW. Other agricultural wastes such as
wood, corn, and coffee residuals are available but in much
smaller qualities. Fuel crops such as bangrass could be
utilized bust at much higher cost. A recent study
estimated that over 600 GWh/yr could be generated from a 90 MW
plant if only 20 percent of Kauai's agricultural lands were
converted to banagrass/
The potential for power production from MSW on Kauai is good but
limited. The Kekaha landfill currently accepts over 200
tons of waste per day. This quantity is sufficient to
generated about 44 GWh/yr of electricity from a 7 MW plant.
Our recent renewable energy study also explored the option of a
combined biomass/MSW plant with a capacity of 32 MW.
Capital costs for a 20 MW direct burn biomass plant would be
approximately $4,600/kW. This would result in a levelized
cost of electricity of between 18.0 to 20.5 cents/kW. The
relatively high cost for electricity is due to the small plant
size and a lock of low cost agricultural waste fuel.
Capital costs for 7.3 MW mass burn MSW plant would be
approximately $11,350/kW. This would result in a levelized
cost of between 2.0 to 10.9 cents.//kW assuming a tipping fee of
between $50 to 90/ton. Tipping fees are what the trash
haulers pay a landfill or MSW to accept their trash.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Direct Burn of Biomass
Advantages
-
mature, proven technology
-
utilizes existing
agricultural infrastructure and expertise
-
creates/retains
agricultural jobs
-
good potential for Kauai
-
carbon neutral
Disadvantages
Mass Burn of MSW
Advantages
-
mature, proven technology
-
minimizes trash going to
landfill
-
less expensive than
conventional generation
Disadvantages